The gesture of the 8th juror helping the 3rd juror with his coat shows how disagreement does not need to unravel into hatred. He also makes a point of demonstrating that it was impractical for him to reach his door in 15 seconds, in order to see the boy running down the stairs. This movie is a wonderful science fiction film wrapped around time travel. He refused to reason with others and absolutely believed that he was right. He was mean and intolerant. He discounts the testimony of the old man, saying it was impossible for him to hear the boy scream over the roar of the passing El-train. His infatuation with death started when his mother died from cancer.
Another, more subtle subject is about the enfranchisement of minority groups at the time which we see through the 11th juror, a man from Central Europe. In both works of literature, the idea of courage that is being conveyed is the ability to do something that one knows is right or gracious, even though it is extremely difficult. They are tasked with an important job of preparing a verdict in the case of sixteen-year-old teenager, who is accused with first degree murder of his father. Juror 8 was also brave. Reasonable doubt is an idea that is put in place to prevent innocent people from getting put in jail. He had no opinion, and just went with what the others were doing. All three of these factors would influence how the jurors would interact with one another and would eventually have 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial.
Juror 8 also overcomes the challenge of expressing his reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty to all the other jurors, facing incredible prejudice and bias against what he. We see why people make the decisions that they do and what in their life drives them to make certain judgments. Based on the stage play, all of the film's action takes place in the jury room. However, they soon realized that they were committing fallacies and then changed their minds. His poor relationship with his own son may have been a factor in his resistance to the reasonable doubt issues that were brought up. He pulls out an exact identical knife out of his pocket. A juror also noticed that she had indents in her nose which means she wore glasses.
Despite his insistence to scrutinise the evidence, other jurors still base their votes on biases, words and personal experiences. Initially, the jurors were not in the same page about the verdict. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. Negotiating success can be attributed to the negotiator understanding his or her personality while being aware of the personalities of others Budjac Corvette, 2007. Firstly, a role can be defined as a set of expected behaviour patterns attributed to that an individual does not need to conform to society 's ideals in order to find their happiness or be successful in life.
There is a definite competitiveness, especially between 3rd Juror and 8th Juror, that is somehow intrinsically masculine. This brought me the realization that my close friends and I have very different personalities due to this we all have different outlooks on the world and different ways of responding to the occurrences of the outside world. The remake of the classic 1957 film makes many good efforts, but falls short in many points. The title of the play is '12 Angry Men,' and it certainly does have an understanding of how particularly men settle problems in a confrontational, often personal, manner. Questions would come up between jurors in deciding whether the kid is innocent or guilty based upon facts. Conversely, we have 10th Juror, who irrationally presumes guilt upon the defendant because of his ethnicity and background.
The law requires the jury to release the defendant unless it is fully convinced of the defendant's guilt. He does not know and he never will. We are capable of faith, hope and charity, and for that matter, of envy, hated and malice. The case should have been a slam dunk, yet one man Juror No. Keywords: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning Introduction 12 Angry Men 1957 is one of the most acclaimed feature films of all time.
This makes it a debated idea and one that can be argued on both sides. This is what might or might not have happened with the boy who was accused of killing his father in the movie 12 Angry Men. The rich drama with minimalist sets occur almost completely within the confines of a jury room. Nevertheless, there is an unexpected variable that comes in the guise of a character known as the 8th juror. As the title of the film implies, all twelve of the main characters are men.
Juror 3 was important because he doubt the men, he was mean, and he topic intolerant. Also, we might think that these men are driven to madness quickly by the heat. At the begining it is clear the boy is guilty and there are no ways around it. That same juror's insistence on reasonable doubt prompts a more in-depth examination of the eye-witnesses; that old person could not have possibly heard that yell over the train's noise or walked to his front door so quickly, and that other woman who had no glasses on could not have seen anything at all. Luckily, they are provided with a leader who maintains organization, order The group type presented in the film 12 Angry men appears to be a task group. Max: 1000 words or 5 slides Task B The Board of Directors of a medium-sized company of Twelve Angry Men is about a jury who must decide the fate of an 18 year old boy who allegedly killed his father. Fallacies in movies A notable fallacy in 12 Angry Men is the appeal to the majority fallacy.
The play was about 12 jurors coming to the same verdict. He is a man of strength tempered with compassion, wants justice to be done, and will fight to see that is 12. They retire to a jury room to do their civic duty and serve up a just verdict for the indigent minority defendant with a criminal record whose life is in the balance. If a jury has any reasonable doubt that the accused may not have committed the crime, then it must enter a not guilty verdict. Fonda violated this norm by voting against the group. There was a lot of peer pressure involved. Courage is not alway found in a Superman-like deed, but instead a smaller act that has just as much emphasis positive consequences towards another person whom it is done for.