Having high standards is a necessary part of our nation's success, it sets a high level of accountability and provides benchmarks for both the student and educators. An English teacher at New Mexico's Valley High School said in Aug. More on This Story: Debating No Child Left Behind The was designed to improve education and achievement in America's schools, in four clearly defined ways: accountability for results; an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research; expanded parental options; and expanded local control and flexibility. It became a process that was intended to help students, but wound up hurting many learning opportunities instead. However, this change in policies did come as quite a shock to teachers, students and parents alike. As a parent, you should be aware of the benefits and drawbacks of high stakes testing, but not limited by them.
More Democracy Many supporters of the No Child Left Behind Act believe that by providing the resources to all students, regardless of ethnicity or financial situation, will result in a more educated generation of graduates. Second, you'll need to understand that tests aren't an absolute measure of a student's intelligence. Before her association with George W. This testing is not just geared toward Title 1 schools; all students between kindergarten and twelfth grade are tested. The main question I come across is: Does this system work? For the American education system to become more competitive and advanced, institutions must hire the best tutors and teachers. Composition I December 10, 2009 The Gifted and No Child Left Behind As each year progresses, students are facing many more challenges and struggles. And because the schools could lose funding if students don't do well on tests, they have an extra incentive to help struggling students.
The standards are set for each individual state. By 2005-2006 each state had to test these subjects annually between the third and twelfth grade and by 2007-2008 school year science was to also be included. State standards are externally imposed on local teachers. Academic improvement in all subject categories. But under those new strict guidelines, many educators complain that schools will suffer unfairly by being labeled as failing when they are really not.
The No Child Left Behind Act was set forth to solve inequalities in testing. Introduction In today's modern society, schools are sometimes forced to leave some children behind. When used for purposes of accountability, standardized tests can provide more objective and less ambiguous evidence. One factor the new responsibility of No Child Left Behind has revealed to be issues is the short rate that English language students are being classified again as expert in English. Not to mention the fact that without assessments, you couldn't tell if you were doing well enough to pass on to the next grade. There is still a lot to work out but the fact that educators are still working on it means that sooner or later, they will get it right. It changed the goal of learning.
Measurement is also based only on an annual multiple tests on reading and math. They could transfer students in-district to the best schools if there was room. Has it really benefited the children in America or has it been more a hindrance? But the schools who receive Title I funding can lose their federal money, which is a big deal for a school that services mostly poor students. After all, if any school or business fails to deliver what was expected or promised, they should absolutely be held responsible for it. The individual states were given time to work out their own standards in order to close the gaps. Because academic standards are set by the state, many professionals argue that comparison of data on a nationwide scale is impossible. This has resulted in fewer English Learner programs for Native Americans that are enrolled in public schools in these states Crawford.
The main proponent of the Act was President George W. Its primary objective was to provide quality and fair education to both the minority and the white majority. To guide instruction, teachers should constantly look for evidence from a variety of sources to make sense of what is happening in their classrooms. It was a process that allowed every student to feel like they were contributing to the learning process. Another problem with this is due to the varying local social and economic differences test scores may not be reflected fairly. List of Cons of the No Child Left Behind Act 1.
Because the penalty for not doing well on tests is to lose Title I funding, schools that don't have Title I funding are not penalized for low test scores. Synthesis view There is emerging evidence that high-stakes state assessment is a potent policy for bringing about positive changes in student learning. Approximately 17 percent of the respondents stated they saw no or little benefits; 21 percent stated they saw an increase in awareness of standards; and 20 percent had stated they saw an increase in awareness of the subgroups of students. Currently, each state sets its own standards. Interested parents, families, and taxpayers can look to their state for detailed information about its academic standards. Prior to her nomination to be Education Secretary, Margaret Spellings worked for the Bush Administration as Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. New standards were put in place that required schools to meet certain criteria or lose funding for their schools.
Some schools allocate more than a quarter of the year's instruction to test prep. Some schools have been accused of cutting back on studies involving science and the arts to increase the focus on English and math. As a parent, you can look at these results to see how well, or poorly, your child's school is performing. Words: 434 - Pages: 2. Insurance companies will have to accept everyone. They could get to know different cultures and ethnicities in the safety of the classroom.
I believe that this structure is all about the money, not about having the correct tools for teaching, instructing, and guiding the student. The act supports standardized educational reforms for students studying in different educational institutions like elementary and secondary schools as well as universities. This puts students who are not very intelligent in a difficult position to keep up with the higher standards of learning. The overall achievement gap between minority students and the white majority has decreased between 1999 and 2004. For instance, school are place on different levels according to the percentage of students passing the standardized test that is given in the subject areas. However, for some students, the noble idea of not.