Oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons. Time to Permit Oil Drilling In the Arctic Refuge 2019-03-01

Oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons Rating: 8,5/10 677 reviews

Oil and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

Based on a mid-range estimate of job creation, this one action would drop the unemployment rate by 0. Facilitating the survival of this ecosystem could be costly, although the environmental effects and costs of preserving the ecosystem are as yet unknown. The measure tagged along in a revision of a tax bill, which would need approval from the House of Representatives and President Trump. Alaskans are more aware of their environment than the outsiders who are ready to make the decisions. Drilling along with the associated manmade developments, from the construction of roads to setting up various facilities, everything causes a dent in the natural scheme of things in a region that is already at risk.

Next

Oil and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

Second: The potential amount of crude oil located there. President pushed to perform exploratory drilling for and in and around the refuge. Low cost when environmental costs are not included Disadvantages: 1. With the ongoing oil drilling, the lives of these animals are disrupted and they will be displaced from their normal environment. In April 2002 the Senate rejected it. Predators such as arctic foxes, ravens and gulls have thrived, feeding on garbage around the oil fields, but they also prey on rarer and in some cases endangered birds, the report said.

Next

APES Ziemer Chapter 12 Flashcards

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

It can be fatal to society if unchecked. Ive cited studies showing lower birth rate and calf survival rate in caribou near oil fields, the greater vulnerability of Porcupine caribou, the vulnerability of the coastal shelf water supply, etc. Yet complex environmental systems are hard to predict and is compounded by the complex nature of oil development. Severe land disturbance and water pollution 2 Fine particle and toxic mercury emissions threaten human health 3. Anthracite hard coal has the highest heat content and low sulfur content. My arguments are based on economists and industry experts.

Next

Chapter 15 APES Review Flashcards

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

So exploration and production would affect only about 2,000 acres. What birds are going to refuse to migrate? Development will aid international relations I claim it is better to be less dependent on Middle Eastern oil rather than more dependent because we could better tolerate a partial slow down or stoppage. The petroleum industry is lauding the decision as a major victory. First time is a freebie but two infractions should be reflected on the ballot. Polar bears, caribou, and wolves roam its 19. Polar bears, caribou, and wolves roam its 19.

Next

How drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could impact wildlife

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

Expanded oil production is badly needed. That's exactly what I said. But all that is poised to change with the current administration's plans. Assuming various regulatory and legal hurdles can be cleared, Alaska and the U. High net energy yield 3.

Next

The Disadvantages of Oil Drilling in Alaska

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

These rates are especially bad outside of the 1002 area. Low risk of accidents in modern plants Disadvantages: 1. Overall, Pro's claims were exaggerated and when called out on them by Con, he retracts it and agrees with Con's numbers. RoyLatham Raisor Tied Agreed with before the debate: - - 0 points Agreed with after the debate: - - 0 points Who had better conduct: - - 1 point Had better spelling and grammar: - - 1 point Made more convincing arguments: - - 3 points Used the most reliable sources: - - 2 points Total points awarded: 2 3 Reasons for voting decision: Close but stronger points on the con side; it came down to the strengths and weaknesses of the fundamental arguments, since evidence was strong for both. It's important because without it we could be developing and using sources that are costing us more energy than what is provided. Very low net energy yield and high overall cost 2. Moreover, it poses virtually no threat to the environment.

Next

Pros and Cons of Drilling in ANWR

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

The precautionary principle is not directly refuted by Roy; however, there is a bit of embedded clash. A winter spill would be even more catastrophic. For now, the future of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge looks to be as uncertain as ever. A polar bear and her cubs explore a spit of land projecting into the Beaufort Sea, waiting for the water to freeze enough so they can hunt seals—their main food source. Proponents say it will create jobs, generate over the next decade, and make the country more energy independent. The question then becomes a matter of which camp outweighs the others.

Next

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling Pros and Cons

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

Consider what right others have to make your decisions? The company originally bid on and won the lease back in 2008. Migratory patterns of animals are also affected. We know that at Prudhoe Bay, the herd has increased by a factor of five since drilling started. He has spent much of the past four years exploring the refuge. Females return there year after year to give birth in the coastal plain. This is compared to a 54% dependence if we do not drill. Toward the end of 1976, with the virtually complete, major conservation groups shifted their attention to how best to protect the hundreds of millions of acres of Alaskan wilderness unaffected by the pipeline.

Next

analyststrategy.com

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

In January 2015, President Barack Obama proposed to designate 12. Pro essentially pulled this number out of thin air. Even if you ignore the environment issue, the International Relations issue alone is reason enough to block drilling. Everybody wins in this scenario, and it's another example of why SolarCity is such a great forward-looking investment. It's logical to swap oil supplies if that reduces delivery costs. At this point I have won this issue and since Pro cant bring up new arguments in his final round, I have won this issue overall.

Next

Chapter 15 APES Review Flashcards

oil drilling in arctic national wildlife refuge pros and cons

When supplies are scarce, the price of oil goes up and so do the prices of other commodities that are based on oil. If that exists, it should be overturned now. Mayor Sonsalla says Shell has failed to work with the villagers on how the company would protect , which are part of Native culture, subsistence life, and diet. Pros and Cons The argument for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is economic. But giving nonsensical reasons speaks to the times, and that's troubling. It protects the core from some external threats tornadoes and plane crashes as well. In conjunction with the Presidential order, the Congress had enacted a moratorium on drilling in 1982, and renewed it annually.

Next