Stricter gun control laws needed. Essay on Are Stricter Gun Control Laws Needed 2019-01-10
Stricter gun control laws needed Rating:
6,8/10
901
reviews
Stricter gun control laws needed
Changing the magazine capacity has nothing to do with less shootings There are adequate laws already in place! Based on production data from firearm manufacturers, there are roughly 300 million firearms owned by civilians in the United States as of 2010. The average state Brady Index score over this period of time is 24. So why is my community safe with bucketloads of guns, yet a community like Chicago is a murderous deathpit even with strict gun laws? Some just look scarier then others. You advocate against the highest law of the land. Michael Shermer is the Founding Publisher of Skeptic magazine, a New York Times best selling author, and a Presidential Fellow at Chapman University where he teaches Skepticism 101.
Should Gun Control Laws Be Stricter? Essay Example
Anyone who wishes to exercise their freedom of speech much submit to a criminal and mental health background check. The privilege of these rights should not be taken away and gun control laws should not become stricter. Should a woman be able to carry a gun with her while walking to work? Just adding up the number of laws in a state assumes that all the laws have the same importance. After that in 1968, 3 laws were made: The Omnibus Crime Control, Safe Street Act of 1968, and The Gun Control Act of 1968, these 3 laws made all criminals, drug users and and mentally sick or ill from buying guns. We need tougher gun laws across the board, but a logical place to start is with the enactment of a federal law requiring background checks on all gun sales.
Columbine took place during the assault weapons ban of 1994. There is a real problem in simply comparing different places at a specific moment in time. There are other ways of getting guns, illegally. I get it if you use a firearm to hunt or you are a policeman, but if you aren't any of those things, then why would you need a gun? Do states require permits to purchase firearms? Are addicted to, or illegally use, any controlled substance; 4. Everything has the potential to kill even s credit card. We hold the right to bear arms.
As an American citizen the laws need to be a lot harder and a lot stricter on who can purchase a gun. The patrol officers are basically driving by empty houses. To some people gun control is a crime issue; to others it is a rights issue. New York: 17 Cumb L. All those lovely weapons you mentioned? We lose more than 36,000 Americans to gun violence every year in this country. Where does it say they have to be a force that is regulated beforehand and therefore the argument goes by the anti-gun people that the framers only intended weapons to be in the hands of people in regards to being in a militia, which is clearly a bunch of bunk. The federal government is to regulate meaning to keep regular commerce among the states.
However, this view is only one sided and it fails to address the link between the ownership of guns and the violence that occurs. Below is part of a long discussion in also has a long discussion in Chp. The most violent mass shooting in the nations history, Virginia Tech, was done with handguns. This party bases their argument on a loose. In 1791, the second amendment of the Constitution was adopted and allowed the people to be able to keep and bear arms Members, 2011.
As you can see, the concept of personal protection is by no means a new one. It goes into effect in March. President Obama is not for making stricter gun control laws. All other firearms — handguns, for example — can only be sold to people 21 and older. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that high-crime states are the ones that most frequently adopt the most stringent gun control laws.
Can we live without gun control? We didn't see this added to the list of the reasons why timber should be banned? On the other hand, the opponents of gun control feel that it would be an infringement on their second amendment rights. Click on the figure to enlarge. Our citizen army would be 100 times worse that that. It just means that the state wanted to have the right to keep their people armed and not have the feds infringe that so that they could organize a militia to defend themselves if need be. The well regulated militia refers to a standing army which is necessary to the defense of the nation, but in light of the fact that a government controlled militia well regulated could be used against the people ie the British militia disarmed the colonists the right of the people to bear arms was not to be infringed. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. There have been several bills passed in the last ten years that have to do with gun control.
Were convicted of a crime punishable in prison for more than one year; 2. It has been a big controversy for the last couple of years whether we should make gun control laws stricter or not. The fact of the matter is that not only are gun control laws unconstitutional, they are totally worthless in that nobody who would commit a mass shooting or any type of gun related crime is going to obey them. Police said that if the doctor had not been armed, many more innocent people would have died. There are 20,000 plus nationwide gun control laws that are currently in force in the United States and for a large part they have had no effect in reducing crime. But also say yes because we need some type of gun control. Rather than lumping all the laws together the normal approach is to simultaneously account for each law separately in a regression.
