If we spend billions on free university education there is an opportunity cost of higher taxes or less spending elsewhere. College tuition should be free because families cannot afford… 1433 Words 6 Pages that the cost of going into a university or a college has become very expensive and would want their government to provide free college tuitions much like the governments in Norway, Sweden, Germany and many other counties in Europe. This essay shall discuss both views before reaching a conclusion. Furthermore, when people pay for something, they often value it more. Therefore, there is a justification for the government subsidising higher education. People with degrees can become teachers and impart knowledge. If high education were free, then instead of struggling to pay tuition, students could work toward learning more.
This is made clear in the conclusion though you can put your opinion in the introduction as well if you wish. If his bill ever gets enacted, Sanders will pay for free college by passing a separate bill that taxes speculative Wall Street sales transactions. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! In the case of public college, that means taxpayers. Further, the more highly educated a person is, the more likely they are to earn a higher income. As a consequence, people who gain a degree, end up with a relatively higher salary.
It is vital for people to value the education they receive. With companies, hiring the educated people over the non-educated people comes an issue, not everyone can afford a degree. This is the actual problem of my cousin which is why he is lucky that his dad is a military because there might be assistance for them. Students need to depend on themselves; otherwise every taxpayer will have to cover their education expenses. A third point is that a university education is a choice, not a requirement. Some students choose to attend community college while some make the decision to take out additional loans.
This statement has caused great controversy over the past decades. I will suggest this to them since they might not be aware, and he will be going to college in two years time. Arguably, there is a greater social benefit from providing vocational training — e. Universities offer assistantships program, as a way to gain employee, in return offer significant financial help and tuition waiver. Everyone would be able to get high quality higher education no matter what economic resources they or their families currently enjoy. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. Another issue is whether we need.
Many students who are in higher education are also being discouraged because of the low job opportunities after they graduate from… 1689 Words 7 Pages Higher education at state colleges and universities should be free for all American citizens. In conclusion, to allow as many people as possible to develop to their full potential and to develop the country, we need to make third level education available to all. For example, only about 20 percent of first-time, full-time students at public two-year colleges earn associate's degrees, diplomas, or certificates within three years of starting. Certainly, taxpayers would still have to help fund it since not all loans would be repaid. For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.
If everyone gets a well paid job, they will contribute to society by becoming taxpayers. A zero-tuition college education simply means that instead of the students bearing the cost of attaining their degrees the taxpayers bear it. During the same period, most Canadian universities introduced discrimination on the basis of national origin by charging international students higher fees than Canadian students. Students who pay for their college are more motivated, hard working and independent. University education gives benefits to the rest of society.
In conclusion, if someone from a poor background is educated, he or she can escape from the poverty cycle,they can advance society with jobs and employment as a result of higher education. In contrast, 54 percent of students at private, non-profit two-year schools—and 63 percent of students at private, for-profit two-year schools—graduate within three years. But the tax requirements would likely be much lower compared to what a tuition-free system would require. Today, 90 percent of our of one of our more than 1,300 community colleges. The economy also benefits from the increased pool of highly educated labor. Generally, university education does offer some external benefits to society. And for those earning incomes above a reasonable threshold, the repayment percentage ranges from only four to eight percent, which is very affordable.
In addition, it is argued that most students benefit from university in terms of higher paid jobs, so it is fair that they pay for at least some of the cost, especially given that the majority of students attending university are from the middle classes. Making education free would mean the money has to be found from elsewhere. However, some people are opposed to free education. For example, in the United States, some grants and scholarships are offered for qualified students. Another advantage of graduating from a university is that it gives you more choices when it comes to choosing a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In the thirty-seven years since Canada has ratified this covenant, not only has free post-secondary education not been progressively introduced in Canada as the treaty requires, but the cost of post-secondary studies has increased dramatically in relation to the rate of inflation.
On the one hand, it should be free since there are poor who are smart, intelligent and capable, yet the state provides no education for them. But I tend to disagree in that there are no 'poor college students'. And will put the right person in the right place. There are no barriers to students entering higher education even without a free tuition system. In his book Generation X Goes to College, Peter Sacks explains how he was driven to make his courses intellectually vapid, Is education a fundamental right found in our constitution? Single life single life and married life are totally different in many aspects. Another struggle is when some parents cant afford college, sometimes they ask for a loan but in the end, cant pay it back.
If students have to pay for university education, this may dissuade them. First of all, through their taxes, poor families subsidize rich students who can easily afford to pay fees. . Do high tuition fees make it more difficult for young people to acquire an education? These institutes offer degrees for less money, which makes it affordable for anybody to attend who wants to. An important point is that the contribution of fees to the budget of any good university or college is relatively small, since almost all colleges rely on large amounts of government or philanthropic funding.