This paper has been reprinted over 80 times, and is widely cited in the. Get started below: Social Media Graphics: Post them online to introduce your friends, fans or followers to Abort73. The first concern I would like to address regards the case of a fetus with a debilitating disease. Don Marquis next mentions that abortion can be justified on certain grounds such as if the birth of a child would seriously threaten the life of the expectant mother. Thomson argues that every person has the right to live and a fetus may not be killed. However, to answer the question on the morality of abortion, several other points have been made that disregard the question of personhood altogether, which will be further discussed here. I recover immediately before my death.
For many people, abortion is immoral—it is the taking of a human life. We can infer that these instances would include situations that would put the mother or child at serious risk by keeping the fetus. Each side then attempts to argue in favor of a principle that explains the wrongness of killing such that it renders a verdict favorable to their own view on the topic of abortion. Furthermore, abstaining from sexual intercourse is also wrong. If fetuses lack an understanding of their future and the world around them, then they do not take an active interest in their future. For a more complete account of my view on abortion, and the standard one according to most moral philosophers, see my posts and. Matt is also interested in history, philosophy, comparative religion, and record collecting.
Objections Marquis Considers to his Argument A necessary condition for the wrongness of killing a being is that doing so interfere with the fulfillment of the being's desire to go on living. According him there were no laws prohibiting abortion in the United States until well into the 19th century. Nobody loses more of their future than children who are killed in the womb. Abort73 is working to change that; you can help! Abortion is viewed as immoral by many people because it kills a life that has done no wrong but be conceived by two people who are incapable of providing, whether it is emotional or financial, needs for that child. Inflicting this type of loss on someone is why he states killing is wrong. Post to student bulletin boards or use as handouts! Marquis believes abortion to be extremely immoral.
However he mentions that there are exceptions in rare but certain circumstances where abortion is acceptable. That is, before we make any moral decisions about abortion, we should ask: what makes killing wrong in the first place? Thirdly, although he did not offer or touch on the nature of the additional accounts needed to discriminate futures, his proposal would somewhat cover the right to life for some nonhuman mammals with similar futures to ours. According to Marquis, abortion is seriously immoral with rare exceptions. Among these things will be various goals, achievements, completed projects, relationships, aesthetic experiences, and so on. Don Marquis born 1935 is an American whose main academic interests are in and. Instead his approach is much more creative he moves outside of the box. It can be reasoned that the argument by Marquis is related to Utilitarianism because he argues that abortion increases suffering because it prevents the opportunity for unborn children from realizing their full potential as they develop and mature.
He then implies that the legal status of abortion could possibly change in the near future. Translating his love of the work of Mark Twain, and also taking inspiration from many tragic events that took most of his family from him, he became the man he is known as today. The standard argument against abortion claims that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. In the next few pages I will delineate the general progression of his argument, and later, will evaluate the plausibility of said argument. The younger you are when you die, the more of your life you lose. That a woman moral right to choose whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Are we in any sort of position to prescribe the value of someone else's future without knowing exactly how it will play out? If so, use the link below and Abort73 gets 4-7% of your total spend! In cases of contraception and abstinence, there is no individual who is wronged.
For if Marquis' contention were true, then contraception would be wrong. Many people who agree with abortion would disagree with Marquis that abortion is the same as killing a person, as much as killing the fetus that would later become a person. Evidence and Analysis There have been. Therefore abortion is almost always wrong. Don Marquis upholds the fact of since abortion deprives the fetus of a future like ours therefore most abortion is morally wrong. Therefore, killing a fetus is morally wrong.
. At the end, she makes the conscious decision of having the abortion. This view gains additional support because: 1 it shows why it would be wrong to kill other intelligent extraterrestrials; 2 it shows why it would be wrong to kill some non-human animals; 3 it does not rule out active euthanasia; and 4 it easily accounts for the wrongfulness of young children something personhood theories have trouble with. According to him there is a standoff. Marquis M begins by noting that few philosophers think abortion is immoral, in fact, the pro-life position has almost no contemporary philosophical support: The view that abortion is, with rare exceptions, seriously immoral has received little support in the recent philosophical literature. Why is killing the fetus wrong? In both cases the wrongness is explained by the appeal to a natural property—pain and suffering or denial of a future—without resorting to personhood.
His argument can be formulated as follows: killing an innocent human being is morally wrong. In some measure, both positions rely on presuppositions. Can we justify aborting this fetus, because although he will be rational and most likely capable of having experiences, the scope of his suffering will be exceedingly great? This action takes away all of the future experiences, activities,. Don Marquis as well as Bonnie Steinbock embraces with the argument of their own, which point out the morality of abortion. Marquis feels that contraception is not immoral because there is no identifiable subject of the loss of their future and value in the case of contraception. George conclude that being a mother generates a special responsibility and that the sacrifice morally required of the mother is less burdensome than the harm that would be done to the child, causing his or her death, to escape responsibility. Each woman I interviewed claimed that no matter the legality of abortion in their respective country, it was still a taboo and private… 1134 Words 5 Pages To put it simply, an abortion is defined as, the intentional termination of a pregnancy most often preformed before the third trimester within weeks 1-28.